01 Cut, not built

The theatre dates from the Roman period, when the city was called Philadelphia and formed part of the Decapolis. A Greek inscription on one of its pillars indicates it was raised in honour of the emperor Antoninus Pius, who reigned between 138 and 161, placing the work in the mid-second century.

The difference from a theatre raised on a structure is enormous in labour and in result. Here the tiers are cut into the slope itself at the foot of the hill, in three horizontal bands separated by walkways, and the rock serves as foundation. It seated some 6,000 people.

Vista desde lo más alto del graderío hacia abajo y hacia el norte: las filas de piedra bajando hasta la escena, una explanada nueva enlosada detrás y, al fondo, una ladera cubierta de edificios beige.
La vista desde la última fila, mirando al norte. El público no tenía el sol de frente en ningún momento de la función.Zairon / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0·CC BY-SA 3.0

02 Why it faces north

Here is the detail that turns the visit into something else. The theatre is oriented north, and not by chance: it was done deliberately to keep the sun out of the spectators' eyes. In a city with 387 hours of sunshine in July alone and no rain at all in summer, that is not a refinement: it is the difference between being able to watch the performance and not.

It is worth grasping what that decision implies. Once the orientation is chosen, everything else is fixed: which slope gets cut, where the stage goes, where the audience enters and what you see beyond. The orientation was not a consequence of the site; it was the criterion that determined the site.

They did not choose the hillside and then the orientation. They chose the orientation, and that is why this hillside worked.

03 What you hear from the top

Galería superior del teatro con columnas de piedra alineadas sobre el muro de coronación, un entarimado de madera nuevo en el suelo y el arranque de las gradas asomando a la izquierda, bajo un cielo azul sin nubes.
La galería de coronación, en lo más alto. Desde aquí se está muy lejos de la escena y aun así se oye todo.Dosseman / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0·CC BY-SA 4.0

The second consequence of cutting into the hillside is the rake, and the rake here is very steep. That produces two effects at once: from the highest rows — a very long way from the stage — the sightlines are excellent because nobody blocks anybody, and you hear clearly because each row receives the sound almost in a straight line.

It is worth climbing to the top and checking, even though it costs you. It is a ten-minute exercise: go up, sit in the last row and listen to the people below in the orchestra. You grasp at once why a building with no mechanical device at all worked for six thousand people.

04 It is still in use

Detalle de un nicho semicircular labrado en la piedra, con la bóveda tallada en forma de venera de gajos profundos y una cenefa de motivos vegetales rodeando el arco, con matas creciendo en las grietas.
Un nicho con la bóveda tallada en forma de concha. Estos detalles están a la vista y casi nadie se para en ellos.Dosseman / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0·CC BY-SA 4.0

And there is one last thing that sets it apart from most ancient theatres you visit: this is not only an archaeological site. It is still used as a venue for cultural activities, among them concerts and music festivals, and the rooms behind the two side entrances house two small museums.

That changes what you are looking at. A theatre in use is not a fenced ruin: it is a facility still doing, eighteen hundred years later, exactly what it was cut into the hill to do. And the northward orientation still works just as well for a summer concert as it did for a second-century performance.

Rate this article

Your vote helps prioritize what we edit next.

No votes yet
LM

Lucía Montes

Worth Knowing editor · Flowtravel

Lucía explains the details that change how you understand a place.