Destination

Canberra was drawn before it existed.

An international competition that closed in January 1912, a hundred and thirty-seven entries and a winning plan that tied the city to the hills around it: two axes, a triangle and a lake that took half a century to fill. Almost everything you see today was decided beforehand on paper.

· 9 min read
The land axis seen from the Mount Ainslie lookout: the avenue, the lake and the parliamentary hill on a single line.
The land axis seen from the Mount Ainslie lookout: the avenue, the lake and the parliamentary hill on a single line.Orion Kahza·CC0

01 A plan before a city

The competition was launched in 1911 and closed on 31 January 1912. A hundred and thirty-seven entries arrived from around the world. The winner was the design by Walter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin, two architects from Chicago; second place went to the Finn Eliel Saarinen.

What won was not a building or a district: it was the entire city, with its axes, radial avenues and circles, drawn over a valley that then held nothing but farms. That starting point explains almost everything a visitor finds odd here today.

The plan was carried out with modifications over decades, and there are stretches that were never built as intended. But the larger structure - the axes, the central triangle, the hills left clear - survived, and it is still the key to reading the city.

An old coloured city plan with radial avenues, concentric circles, contour lines and an ornate title cartouche in the upper left corner.
The plan published by the capital commission from the winning design: circles, radials and contour lines on the same sheet.Australia. Federal Capital Commission; Walter Burley Griffin / Public domain  · Public domain

02 The axes point at the hills

The first axis, the land axis, runs in a straight line from the southern hill, where parliament stands, north to Mount Ainslie, at 843 metres. The second, the water axis, opens to the north-west towards Black Mountain, at 812 metres.

The two axes are not decorative: they are visual. Each ends on a real rise you can see from the far end, and the whole is closed by three avenues bounding the central triangle, the most worked part of the plan.

Beyond the city stands Bimberi Peak, the territory's highest, some fifty-two kilometres to the south-west. The design used the landscape as structure: the hills are not the backdrop, they are the vertices.

A wide, calm lake with a small wooded island in the middle, a forested hill topped by a telecommunications tower behind, and white clouds.
The lake towards the north-west, with Black Mountain behind: the direction of the water axis.Ymblanter / CC BY-SA 4.0  · CC BY-SA 4.0

03 The lake arrived fifty years later

Lake Burley Griffin, the centrepiece of the composition, is artificial. It was formed by damming the Molonglo River and completed in 1964, after four years of works. Which is to say: for half a century the city existed without the element that organises it.

That means much of what you see around the water - the landscaped banks, the bridges, the institutions lined up in the triangle - postdates 1964, even though their positions were fixed in the original plan.

Today the lake works as a hinge: it separates the commercial centre to the north from the institutional group to the south and, at the same time, links them with two bridges. Without it, the axes would be lines across a meadow.

A view from the water between the two parallel decks of a concrete bridge, its piers reflected and a wooded shore beyond.
One of the two bridges that cross the lake and close the city's central triangle.Dietmar Rabich / CC BY-SA 4.0  · CC BY-SA 4.0

04 A valley at 580 metres

Canberra sits at around 580 metres, inland and ringed by ranges. It is not a coastal city or a port: it is an interior valley chosen for its position and for the room it offered, not for any prior commercial advantage.

The population is around 485,000 across a territory of 2,358 square kilometres. The resulting density is very low, and you feel it on foot: between one neighbourhood and the next there is almost always a band of bush or grassland.

That discontinuity also comes from the plan. The inner hills were left unbuilt, so the city grows in pieces separated by green relief instead of spreading as one continuous stain.

A grassy slope with young trees planted in bands, a curving road, a forested hill with a tower to the left and a scattered city among trees in the distance.
From a western rise: the city appears spread among hills and tree cover, not concentrated.Nbound / CC0  · CC0

05 How to get around

The most efficient way to understand it is to go up to one of the lookouts first. From Mount Ainslie, to the north, the land axis appears whole: the avenue, the lake, the triangle and the parliamentary hill lined up on a single straight line.

After that, the natural route is the lake: the southern bank holds the institutions and the northern one the commercial part. You can go all the way round on foot or by bicycle, and from any point you can see at least one of the hills that served as a vertex.

Canberra confuses you if you go looking for an old quarter, because there is none and never was. It makes sense the moment you accept that it is not a grown city but a composed one: a 1912 drawing that the terrain gave volume to over a hundred years.

Worth the read?
Rate this guide
No ratings yet
Last updated · reviewed by the FlowTravel desk
MR

María Reyes

Destinations editor · Flowtravel

María Reyes looks for the physical logic of each city: why it is where it is and why it has the shape it has.

Image credits