01 Two cities on the same ground

In most cases, one of the two layers wins. Either the ancient site is preserved and what came later is demolished, or the medieval city stays inhabited and the Roman remains buried beneath it. Here neither happened: the medieval enclosure was abandoned, the modern city grew elsewhere and the whole thing was left as it was.

The result is that you walk on Roman paving while looking at a fourteenth-century ochre wall, and both fit in the same photograph with no effort of framing. It is the kind of place that explains a thousand years of urban history without needing a single sign.

02 The lower one: Sala Colonia

The Roman city occupied a rise above the Bou Regreg valley, a site chosen for the usual reasons: control of the river and the route. What is visible of it today are rectangular footings, perfectly aligned courses of ashlar and, above all, stretches of paved street that let you follow the layout on foot.

You walk down a Roman street and look up at a wall built a thousand years later. Nothing has to be imagined.

That legibility is what surprises most. At many sites you have to mentally reconstruct what was a street from two aligned stones. Here the paving is intact over long stretches, with its kerbs in place, and the city's grid is easy to make out.

An archaeological enclosure photographed late in the afternoon, the light low and golden: in the foreground, a low wall of limestone blocks covered in orange lichen closes the frame; behind it stretches a field of ruins with footings, fallen columns and remains of walls at half height on dry compacted earth; to the right rises a square tower of golden stone with panels of carved decoration and a bulky nest of branches on top; to the left and at the back, the enclosure wall runs over a rise and a palm, olive trees and scattered woodland appear; on the horizon a pale plateau can be made out; the sky blue with sizeable white clouds.
Footings and ashlar at the site, with the enclosure wall running over the rise behind. Both layers share the frame.HalaRah / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0·CC BY-SA 4.0

03 The upper one: the fourteenth-century wall

Centuries after the Roman city was abandoned, the Marinids raised their own enclosure here: an ochre wall with horseshoe-arched gates, square towers and carved decoration still preserved on some panels. It is the silhouette you see from a distance as you approach the site.

The relationship between the two layers is physical and quite literal. The medieval wall rests on and adapts to the relief left by the earlier city, and at some points it reuses Roman material directly. It is not a restoration or a museum display: it is a construction made with what was to hand.

There is also a third layer that is not human and has become the site's image: the storks. The tower tops are occupied by bulky nests of dry branches, some very large, and the birds come and go while you walk the site.

04 How to see it

It is a couple of kilometres from the old core, to the south, and it is a short visit: an hour and a half is enough to walk it calmly. The useful way to do it is to start at the top, beside the enclosure gate, for the overall view, and then come down to the level of the Roman paving.

Light matters more than usual. The golden limestone and the orange lichen on the blocks catch fire in low sun, and at midday the whole thing flattens out considerably. Late afternoon is clearly the best moment, and it also coincides with the storks' activity.

A view of the city from the opposite bank of an estuary, with clean blue sky filling the upper third: on a rocky spur stands a compact quarter of whitewashed houses, two and three storeys high with flat roofs, packed against each other and topped by a square tower of pale stone; the whole rests on an ochre rammed-earth wall dropping to the promenade, edged by a row of palms; at middle distance, a dozen fishing boats with white and blue hulls float in the channel; in the foreground, banks of silt and saltmarsh with low green vegetation where dozens of gulls settle.
The Bou Regreg valley, downstream of the site. Controlling it was the reason the Roman city was placed there.Oumaima Loudini / Wikimedia Commons / CC0·CC0 1.0
The corner bastion of a wall seen from an empty paved esplanade: the tower, massive and octagonal in plan, is built of golden ashlar with three pointed-arch niches on its face and a small dark wooden door at ground level; to the left a taller, paler stretch of wall begins; to the right, the wall continues away in perspective with square towers topped by stepped merlons and a final run of ochre rendered wall; at the foot of the wall grows a row of dwarf palms on a bank of shrubs; at the back the low city spreads with white buildings and the odd modern tower, under a whitish sky; nobody is in the frame.
The kasbah enclosure, at the other end of the city. It is the third of the four built layers you can walk here.Jorge Láscar / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 2.0·CC BY 2.0

And it is worth fitting it into the city as a whole, because that is what gives it meaning. Rabat has been on the World Heritage list since 2012 as 'modern capital and historic city', for its 1197 walls and its 1913 extension. Chellah adds two more layers below, and none of the four covers the others.

Rate this article

Your vote helps prioritize what we edit next.

No votes yet
LM

Lucía Montes

Worth Knowing editor · Flowtravel

Lucía stops at what a place takes for granted and nobody explains.